relationships

why are relationships so difficult?

All feelings are welcome here

contact me at:
relationships3@aol.com

http://twitter.com/relationships3
Custom Search

Our Sponsors

More

Blog Status

  • 5 yrs 21 wks 3 days old
  • Updated: 27 Nov 2009
  • 8,440 entries
  • 34,295 comments

Quick Poll

Are women really attracted bad boy/jerks more than than they are to caring responsible guys?
Yes
No
Not Sure

Linkblogs

relationship talk

Fri, 02/23/07 12:13 A GMT-05

Newsfeeds

Sun, 09/10/06 12:07 P GMT-05

Leo Buscaglia Quotes

Sun, 08/27/06 11:32 A GMT-05

About Psychology

Sat, 07/08/06 11:48 P GMT-05
Tags:  

Fault tolerance

Sat, 06/03/06 1:25 P GMT-05
Tags:    

Social Psychology Network

Sun, 05/28/06 5:15 P GMT-05

Go Ask Alice

Fri, 04/14/06 9:09 P GMT-05
Tags:  

Picturing Women

Thu, 03/30/06 2:55 P GMT-05
Tags:  

The Attitude Doctor

Wed, 03/29/06 7:01 P GMT-05

From Sophia's Blog verewig

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Call it the eternal embrace.

http://verewig.blog-city.com/

Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Midlife Crisis

Midlife Crisis Thoughts

Mailing List

Search Box

 

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting
RelationshipTalk.net
Mars, Venues and in-between

What Women Want

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

How does he make her feel so sexy?

Women's thoughts concerning size

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

The Size of it

Why do Women Crave Bad Guys?

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Bad Boys

RSS Add-Me








Women's choices in men? (2,007)

posted Sun, 11/22/09

Scientific Research claims that women really do crave jerks and that truly good guys do really finish last.

By Steve Connor, Science Editor

Why do psychopaths exist? The ladies help the psychopaths reproduce by going to bed with them. Men who are narcissistic, self-obsessed, liars, psychopaths, Machiavellian, and thrill-seekers get laid more.

Bad boys really do get all the girls. Women might claim they want caring, thoughtful types but scientists have discovered what they really want - self-obsessed, lying psychopaths.

A study has found that men with the "dark triad" of traits – narcissism, thrill- seeking and deceitfulness – have a larger number of sexual affairs.

Peter Jonason, of New Mexico University in Las Cruces, believes that these traits may have an innate, genetic component that explains why some men seem unable to stop themselves behaving badly.

The dark triad of traits are the self-obsession of narcissism, the impulsive, thrill-seeking and callous behaviour of psychopaths and the deceitful and exploitative nature of Machiavellianism. "We have some evidence these traits may represent a successful evolutionary strategy," Dr Jonason told New Scientist magazine.

Many famous men – from James Dean to Pete Doherty – could be said to show elements of the dark triad of traits, but perhaps the best fictional example is James Bond. "He's clearly disagreeable, very extrovert and likes trying new things – including killing people and new women," Dr Jonason said.

The study subjected 200 college students to personality tests designed to rank them in terms of the dark triad. They were also asked about their sexual relationships, including their attitude towards brief affairs.

Dr Jonason said those with the highest rating in terms of the dark triad have more sexual partners and a greater desire for short-term affairs.

The dark triad approach is one way of maximising a man's reproductive potential by having sex with many females, while not bothering to stick around to help with the children. "The strategy seems to have worked. We still have these traits," Dr Jonason said.

David Schmitt, of Bradley University in Peoria, Illinois, surveyed 35,000 people in 57 countries and found a similar link. "It is universal across cultures," he said.

Women find nice intolerable.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit

AddThis Social Bookmark Button



The purpose of this site is to allow you to express how you feel. It’s not to determine whom is right or wrong.


1. Dave left...
Sun, 08/03/08 9:35 pm

So it appears that women create jerks.

are nice guys justified in believing that women are too stupid to breathe, much less be trusted to select their own sexual partners?

And ladies, is being hurt and misused by men is your natural role and your fulfillment as a woman based on your sexual attraction? Is this why so many women end up in shelters?


2. Eva left...
Mon, 11/10/08 2:00 pm

Dave - You base your opinion under the assumption that women want men specifically for these traits. Trust me, women have just as much reason to be bitter as men. More, actually, but you won't agree because you're biased. What these scientists see as "narcissistic", women see as confident. What they see as "impulsive", we see as spontaneous. What they see as "thrill-seeking", we see as brave. I seriously doubt that the women tested affirmed that they prefer narcissistic men. This is just how the person who wrote the article decided to state it. Because this is what he believes. James Bond is desirable because he is confident, brave, masculine, clever, handsome, successful and highly intelligent. It's just a matter of perception. Men also neglect the fact that these men are sought after mainly for their sexual appeal. This in no way signifies that these women would choose to stay with this man for life, when his flaws become apparent. Men aren't expected to only want to have sex with women that are loyal and virtuous, so why are women expected to? Why do men push away good women in favor of physically attractive, shallow, self-absorbed, and promiscuous women? At least until they feel that they are no longer young enough to find women worthy of their affections. If the gene pool is an argument, men are just as much to blame as women because they sleep around with multiple women of less desirable traits. Not only do they do this, but they are almost always the ones who insist on not wearing a condom. That's not to say that women shouldn't insist otherwise, and are not at fault. The point is that it is the fault of BOTH sexes. Perhaps if men would ask the right questions, instead of fueling their own ridiculous claims that women actually prefer to be treated poorly, we could actually get somewhere in this conflict. Until then, why don't you work on curing cancer, instead of perverting the truth to try and rationalize your own failure with obtaining more women than you need?


3. Ali left...
Mon, 11/10/08 2:42 pm

Eva now let me ask you a common sense question...why would somebody get narcissism mixed up with confidence unless they were blind to the truth? Willful ignorance is certainly not bliss. So just because somebody acts like they are the man, you think they are the man, without doing any fact finding, and even in the presence of other red flags that should make you question this opinion? Come on....you know, some people have an issue with romanticizing everything about a person even if those traits indicate obvious character flaws. He's bad but she loves him for it. He did something bad but he did it for a good reason. Those people must have gotten what they had coming to them, or his (insert bad behavior) is his way of saying he cares, etc. Always making excuses for the guy's misdeeds and BS. Well there you go. No missunderstanding there, these women know what time it is, but they're playing an active role in the cover-up. Yeah narcissism is an ugly word. So are a lot of other things. So sometimes people try to pretend that things are not what they are so they don't have to face the truth. But at the end of the day, it still is what it is. If their perception of things was right, they wouldn't keep becomming attracted to toxic personalities would they? If confidence was so important, wouldn't they seek true confidence instead of arrogance and self-centeredness? Or wouldn't they at least want to avoid known problematic men who are typically trouble? Don't play pretend that they don't know what they're doing either. If somebody plays the obvious villian and you choose instead to see him as a troubled hero, that's an issue with the eye of the beholder. So don't blame the people who make the observation that certain women do crave certain men despite the obvious red flags and all that jazz. There's an elephant in the middle of the room but rather than address the elephant, and why it is there, and what should be done about it...I guess it's easier to discredit the people who call attention to the elephant?


4. rod left...
Thu, 11/13/08 2:55 pm

simply put,women look for a genetic strong sperm donor and a geneticly weak provider.


5. S.B.R. left...
Fri, 12/26/08 7:34 pm

I found Eva's commentary most credible to the truth. Dave, I'm concerned for your viewpoint in assuming shelters are for women who crave unhealthy relationships. Do women desire unhealthy relationships? No. I think women are attracted to who they are attracted to/same as men, and then with logic,...we are given choices to either act proceed with caution or find the exit stratedgy. I am attracted to a certain type of man,...who yes, is a little bitter from women from both equally shared mistakes from past relationships but that doesn't have anything to do with how I want to enjoy time with him, be there for him, bond with him, and most of all know that if it is not a healthy relationship for ME,.... then I have a decision to make. This one particular guy I like can be misconstrued as a not so nice, kinda callous, a bit of a jerk. On the other hand, I can be be the same exact way as a female. The role in which I dare to be with him is bring him some moral support, some guidance, love, honesty, trust, and try not to make stupid mistakes that could have him not respect my logic when I want to be a giver to him or play on his terf. I also need him to understand I can be beside him through a dark hour in his life and be his friend and confidant. He might have many women too who adore him as much as I do but who am I to settle for a guy/man who is what society thinks I should be with that hasn't experienced the painful relationships that I have. I will choice to be with who I want and strive to be a decent/spontaneous at times/responsible/tough but intelligent/sexy woman. If I decide to walk away, then I do,... with nothing but the principal that I am led by my own compass and desires of the man I am sexually and intellectually stimulated by as a lover/friend.


6. rod left...
Sat, 12/27/08 4:16 pm

it makes sense that a tribe full of psychopaths would survive better then a tribe full of nice guys.can you imagine a nice guy going out and kiling animals or threatning neighbors? the problem now is that tecnology progressed at a faster rate then our nervous system. even when a woman is inteligent enough to work this out and marries a nice guy she is not sexualy fulfiled,enough proof of womens hiehgr sex drive is how many vibrators are sold every year,have any of you looked up the profit of vibrator making companies? this sex drive is not fulfilled by nice guys they are married to ,but when they were younger and were going out all the time they were having plenty of sex with psycopaths aka bed boys.


7. Ali left...
Sat, 12/27/08 11:51 pm

Then they like jerks because they are jerks too. Maybe it's that simple.


8. Webmaster X left...
Fri, 01/30/09 12:15 pm

"are women too stupid to breathe, much less be trusted to select their own sexual partners?" YES

"simply put, women look for a genetic strong sperm donor and a geneticly weak provider." SAD BUT TRUE.

"They like jerks because they are jerks too. Maybe it's that simple." You may be right. I'm guessing women like jerks because they are just plain fucking stupid.

MEN - YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!


9. Woodsmen left...
Fri, 01/30/09 1:16 pm

"it makes sense that a tribe full of psychopaths would survive better then a tribe full of nice guys. Can you imagine a nice guy going out and killing animals or threatening neighbors?"

This is a good way to look at it. Puts in better perspective the fact that attraction isn't a choice. Evolution created this issue. In our past who could get more food? The risk takers did and they lived and they passed on their DNA. All through human history food has always been in short supply until technology help solve that problem. We as humans have not evolved past wanting to breed with risk takers. Although the risk takers would tend to be self absorbed and after awhile the females would want the stability of a non-psychopath later in life to raise the babies. Today rich men are risk takers, the tattooed freak at the bar is a risk taker. He is triggering old habits that have not evolved out of us. As for James Bond to a bad boy? James Bond has a purpose to the way he is. It's not random BS, but a woman can not tell the difference.


10. Ali left...
Fri, 01/30/09 2:36 pm

Do you really think psychopaths will work together? Look at happens when you throw a bunch of psychopaths together in one area, such as the case in prison. They fight, intimidate, beat up and rape each other. In reality a tribe of psychopaths would implode due to the various neuroses going on in that group. The selfish hidden agendas, the asshole behaviors, the dog-eat-dog mentality...they'd kill each other off. Get your mind out of the "evolution" mindtrap and look at this realistically: THIS SHIT DOESNT WORK. If it did, women would not wind up with the short end of the stick time and time again after dealing with these psychopaths, narcisists, womanizers, phillanderers and so on.


11. Tommy left...
Sat, 01/31/09 11:08 am

The psychopaths will attack each other to assert their status as the most dominant, even through slaughtering and cannibalizing each other. The other tribe would put their egos aside to actually try to survive.


12. Child of the Graveyard left...
Mon, 02/02/09 6:45 am

james bond is NOT sexy.


13. Child of the Graveyard left...
Mon, 02/02/09 7:06 am

can someone please do a study on why some women crave weird, introverted, shy, loners for sex parnters?

i don't know, i'm kind of curious about the TYPE of woman would want a guy like that and why. it's just a thought.

ANYWAY, about the thing said about evolution and how only assholes can survive: That makes no sense because survival is by only by CHANCE. we would NEVER be programmed to make decisions that ensure we evolve and survive. if we did, it would mean intelligent design, NOT evolution. survival is by CHANCE. that's how evolution happened, by CHANCE. anybody that knows anything about evolution ill tell you that. it was probably all an accident. i think the only reason we humans survived is because our ancestors would fuck anything, not because women have chosen to reproduce with assholes. look at how chimpanzees fuck-- it's what explains why we humans survived. because before we started building civilizations and making laws, we fucked like chimpanzees. prehistory (before written records) is a MUCH longer period than history. humans had HUGE amounts of time to multiply before laws and culture were created. we are alive today, because by chance, humans are programmed to want alot of sex-- so as long as nothing psychogically damaging affects them. sorry if my scientific explanations to everything are annoying.


14. WarHammer Axe left...
Mon, 02/02/09 9:37 am

A wise man said this about women:

During a party I attended on the weekend, an acquaintance told me, after telling me “Your reputation precedes you”,

that “The girls all want you badly, but they are afraid you will be using them “

To give an explanation, I am an intelligent guy, good looking, aggressive looking and an attitude definitely not nice, but also not hardcore asshole. As I will explain later, herein lies the problem.

To further help my point, the dude who told me that is a gym instructor, is married, has two kids, is what girls would call a “cute asshole”, and he has slept with unknown number of women in the gym, women who all know that he is married and is a father of two.

I divide men into a few groups, from the attractiveness point of view, and have seen that women have different modes of operation towards these men, mind you, these are my observations and experiences, so scientifically they may not be valid. And I am talking about attractiveness to girls from 6 to up, as I have no interest in anything less attractive myself.

The Invisible: this is the Under-Average Joe. Invisible to these girls, with a change in attitude, may rise to the next level, but very difficult, as he is, invisible. Nice or not nice.

The Average Joe : Women know these guys exist, and maybe even will sleep with him in their prime, if the winds of luck were blowing towards him. Usually nice guys, if they display attitude or status, they may get laid more often, i.e. Increasing the lucky numbers on a dice. Still, these average less lifetime partners than the Average Jane. (one has to keep in mind the overreporting and underreporting issues in the surveys) This and the upper compose 80% of men.

The Nice Attractive Dick: Past-prime marriage material. Better than Average Joe, but still these are the dudes who get sex mainly in relationships. Spontaneous fucking in high numbers is kind of out of their reach. 15%…

The Bad/Lesser Attractive Dick : Now we are moving up a good number of levels, these guys are in a realm, that the Average Joe possibly gets a hint of, these men get laid quite often, but lack the qualities that would make them the ideal life partner for women. But getting laid, oh yes. (2%)

“The One” Dick: This man is more attractive than “the Bad/Lesser Attractive Dick”, sexually and long term. This is the man who women look at and whisper to their girlfriends about, and is the man they want to commit to. (and herein lies the curse). This man is confident, has intelligence, the status, usually the looks, and has attitude. Swings between good behavior and bad behavior. (2%)

The Semi God Dick: these are the men that override women’s inhibitions arising from long term thinking. Few men in hundred are like this, in my observations, around 1. These are the men who rack up thousand partners if they want, and have more coming to them. Would be movie stars , music stars (rnb, rap, pop, rock), genuine assholes, certified thugs, male models, trust fund kids with attitude, and so on. Not even the top 4% of men stated above have an idea of what is going on there.

In this text, using the above grouping seems better than simple Alpha-Beta grouping. Correct me if I am wrong.

So, back to “The girls all want you badly, but they are afraid you will be using them “.

Tells me I am an attractive man

I would respect the girls’ feeling of not wanting to be used. In the end I do give a “don’t give a flying fuck” vibe, while I still (sometimes) treat them with a level dignity no matter how uncaring, unattached I am. I still don’t call the “whore” to their face… “you wanna fuck” is more like me. Call it Bad boy with a heart, Gentleman Asshole or whatever.

I would respect it if they kept their fucking legs closed.

But no, they have to fuck the drunk the same night they told me about dignity, they have to rack up 100+ partners when talking to me about if they were used by me they’d lose their dignity.

Ladies, you fucked your rights to expect decent treatment away. You fucked your sexual value, long term asking price to the ground.

When this dude told me that I thought, “bitches, this is the reason why you will not get commitment out of me”.. Tell me you want me, then fear being used, and then bang the drunk dude, or this slimy mofo,… no, no, no.. It aint that way.

You want respect from me, bang me, and then post-bang, prove to me you are selective in a way that respects quality, and intelligence, do not punish it.

See, the reason the “The Bad/Lesser Attractive Dick” (TBLAD) is banging easier than “”The One” Dick” (TOD) is this.

“”The One” Dick” you want to father your child. Carry his gene to eternity, and also want him long term.

TBLAD is good for a fuck, also good for genes, but not a good man to live with forever, so you don’t mind getting used by him, because anyway you are using him for your sexual pleasure.

Now the TOD is a much better prospect, making you all wet and such, but you want him long term, so what do you do, you do not fuck him, and if he approaches you, you punish him this way or that. Needless to say the Semi God Dick is above all this. It is a “fuck him no matter what” category.

You can rave all you want “I am afraid he will use me”… You know what, precisely because of those words he will use you, because when you utter those words, it is clear you were rewarding the assholes etc, but being careful about TODs, and not giving them what they want, which is essentially the same as the assholes, even though you crave more for the TODs.

I know who you were fucking and who you were not. By these choices you made, you lost the right to be treated the way you want to be treated.

Yes, I will not curse at you, nor will I call you names. I will not slap you either.

What I will do, is pump and dump.

Fuck and chuck.

Uzem and Luzem.

Because when you rewarded low quality, you lessened your value. And destroyed any right to ask me for anything other than a cheap and easy lay, where I preserve the right to do whatever gets you to spread your legs, and then make a 180 if I feel like.

If you were keeping your legs closed, then I would have taken that fear of being used as a fear of being used, and would actually raise your dignity value in my eyes.

But you cant fucking keep your legs closed when horny, can you. Oooooh… but he is quality man, so he will use meeeee… Better I fuck this drunk dude, he cant use meeeeee…

And I am going to respect that?

Fuck you.

....Fuck,

I was told

“If he was intelligent and left in the morning she would feel used, but he was dumb, so she did not feel bad in the morning when she left”..

By an exceptionally intelligent and gorgeous woman. Also damaged goods, (btw in this case intelligent does not lower his alpha status, but still has a negative impact because he knows what he is doing??? He is a good long term prospect?? A catch???) And I am supposed to respect that?

Fuck you.

The intelligent man sees this.

You cunts shot yourself in your own cunts.

Btw, for the shamers out there, I have fucked more women than 95% of men, and in doing so I have fucked attractive ones, slept with many, fucked some, got fucked by some. So don’t try “the cant get laid” shit on me.

Oh, I fucked girls from every circle, so don’t try that “Not all girls are like that” shit either.

These words I heard were the last in a long string of events that brought me to the point to either,

- Cut down the intelligence when dealing with the broads as long as I have no interest in committing - Increase bad behavior to override or burn the long term qualities. - Inflate the intelligence and the attitude to reach a God like image. As if I would be cumming diamonds or something.

Damn. Your opinions are welcome.

And a last word to the ladies, Your choices have fucking consequences. Edit/Delete MessageDuring a party I attended on the weekend, an acquaintance told me, after telling me “Your reputation precedes you”, that

“The girls all want you badly, but they are afraid you will be using them “

To give an explanation, I am an intelligent guy, good looking, aggressive looking and an attitude definitely not nice, but also not hardcore asshole. As I will explain later, herein lies the problem.

To further help my point, the dude who told me that is a gym instructor, is married, has two kids, is what girls would call a “cute asshole”, and he has slept with unknown number of women in the gym, women who all know that he is married and is a father of two.

I divide men into a few groups, from the attractiveness point of view, and have seen that women have different modes of operation towards these men, mind you, these are my observations and experiences, so scientifically they may not be valid. And I am talking about attractiveness to girls from 6 to up, as I have no interest in anything less attractive myself.

The Invisible: this is the Under-Average Joe. Invisible to these girls, with a change in attitude, may rise to the next level, but very difficult, as he is, invisible. Nice or not nice.

The Average Joe : Women know these guys exist, and maybe even will sleep with him in their prime, if the winds of luck were blowing towards him. Usually nice guys, if they display attitude or status, they may get laid more often, i.e. Increasing the lucky numbers on a dice. Still, these average less lifetime partners than the Average Jane. (one has to keep in mind the overreporting and underreporting issues in the surveys) This and the upper compose 80% of men.

The Nice Attractive Dick: Past-prime marriage material. Better than Average Joe, but still these are the dudes who get sex mainly in relationships. Spontaneous fucking in high numbers is kind of out of their reach. 15%…

The Bad/Lesser Attractive Dick : Now we are moving up a good number of levels, these guys are in a realm, that the Average Joe possibly gets a hint of, these men get laid quite often, but lack the qualities that would make them the ideal life partner for women. But getting laid, oh yes. (2%)

“The One” Dick: This man is more attractive than “the Bad/Lesser Attractive Dick”, sexually and long term. This is the man who women look at and whisper to their girlfriends about, and is the man they want to commit to. (and herein lies the curse). This man is confident, has intelligence, the status, usually the looks, and has attitude. Swings between good behavior and bad behavior. (2%)

The Semi God Dick: these are the men that override women’s inhibitions arising from long term thinking. Few men in hundred are like this, in my observations, around 1. These are the men who rack up thousand partners if they want, and have more coming to them. Would be movie stars , music stars (rnb, rap, pop, rock), genuine assholes, certified thugs, male models, trust fund kids with attitude, and so on. Not even the top 4% of men stated above have an idea of what is going on there.

In this text, using the above grouping seems better than simple Alpha-Beta grouping. Correct me if I am wrong.

So, back to “The girls all want you badly, but they are afraid you will be using them “.

Tells me I am an attractive man

I would respect the girls’ feeling of not wanting to be used. In the end I do give a “don’t give a flying fuck” vibe, while I still (sometimes) treat them with a level dignity no matter how uncaring, unattached I am. I astill don’t call the “whore” to their face… “you wanna fuck” is more like me. Call it Bad boy with a heart, Gentleman Asshole or whatever.

I would respect it if they kept their fucking legs closed.

But no, they have to fuck the drunk the same night they told me about dignity, they have to rack up 100+ partners when talking to me about if they were used by me they’d lose their dignity.

Ladies, you fucked your rights to expect decent treatment away. You fucked your sexual value, long term asking price to the ground. When this dude told me that I thought, “bitches, this is the reason why you will not get commitment out of me”.. Tell me you want me, then fear being used, and then bang the drunk dude, or this slimy mofo,… no, no, no.. It aint that way.

You want respect from me, bang me, and then post-bang, prove to me you are selective in a way that respects quality, and intelligence, do not punish it.

WarHammer Axe


15. WarHammer Axe left...
Mon, 02/02/09 9:39 am

See, the reason the “The Bad/Lesser Attractive Dick” (TBLAD) is banging easier than “”The One” Dick” (TOD) is this.

“”The One” Dick” you want to father your child. Carry his gene to eternity, and also want him long term.

TBLAD is good for a fuck, also good for genes, but not a good man to live with forever, so you don’t mind getting used by him, because anyway you are using him for your sexual pleasure.

Now the TOD is a much better prospect, making you all wet and such, but you want him long term, so what do you do, you do not fuck him, and if he approaches you, you punish him this way or that. Needless to say the Semi God Dick is above all this. It is a “fuck him no matter what” category.

You can rave all you want “I am afraid he will use me”… You know what, precisely because of those words he will use you, because when you utter those words, it is clear you were rewarding the assholes etc, but being careful about TODs, and not giving them what they want, which is essentially the same as the assholes, even though you crave more for the TODs.

I know who you were fucking and who you were not.

By these choices you made, you lost the right to be treated the way you want to be treated.

Yes, I will not curse at you, nor will I call you names. I will not slap you either.

What I will do, is pump and dump.

Fuck and chuck.

Uzem and Luzem.

Because when you rewarded low quality, you lessened your value.

And destroyed any right to ask me for anything other than a cheap and easy lay, where I preserve the right to do whatever gets you to spread your legs, and then make a 180 if I feel like.

If you were keeping your legs closed, then I would have taken that fear of being used as a fear of being used, and would actually raise your dignity value in my eyes.

But you cant fucking keep your legs closed when horny, can you. Oooooh… but he is quality man, so he will use meeeee… Better I fuck this drunk dude, he cant use meeeeee…

And I am going to respect that?

Fuck you.

....Fuck,

I was told

“If he was intelligent and left in the morning she would feel used, but he was dumb, so she did not feel bad in the morning when she left”..

By an exceptionally intelligent and gorgeous woman. Also damaged goods, (btw in this case intelligent does not lower his alpha status, but still has a negative impact because he knows what he is doing??? He is a good long term prospect?? A catch???) And I am supposed to respect that?

Fuck you.

The intelligent man sees this.

You cunts shot yourself in your own cunts.

Btw, for the shamers out there, I have fucked more women than 95% of men, and in doing so I have fucked attractive ones, slept with many, fucked some, got fucked by some. So don’t try “the cant get laid” shit on me.

Oh, I fucked girls from every circle, so don’t try that “Not all girls are like that” shit either.

These words I heard were the last in a long string of events that brought me to the point to either,

- Cut down the intelligence when dealing with the broads as long as I have no interest in committing - Increase bad behavior to override or burn the long term qualities. - Inflate the intelligence and the attitude to reach a God like image. As if I would be cumming diamonds or something.

Damn. Your opinions are welcome.

And a last word to the ladies, Your choices have fucking consequences.

WarHammer Axe


16. Ali left...
Mon, 02/02/09 11:42 am

I was talking to one of my buddies about this kind of thing, and I was like WTF? he said if we knew how to figure out the answer to this shit we would know how to figure out anything lol.


17. Django left...
Mon, 11/09/09 7:33 am

If you really want this type of woman (personally I don't - far too unstable and insecure on the whole) then find out what they want and fake it. It's not really a question of intelligence it's more that when feeling or instinct is engaged in most people reason slips into neutral. The reasons for this female preference are obviously to do with evolution. Under primitive conditions the most aggressive male was probably the best provider. No longer holds true under modern conditions but then instinct hasn't caught up with social changes, in particular with the industrial revolution. It is unfortunately true that the better women are treated the worse they behave and the worse they're treated the better they behave. I've seen this far too often to be in any doubt about it. They see consideration as weakness, regard it with contempt and exploit it relentlessly and to destruction. This explains a lot about the absurdities of women over the last half century and is a clear pointer as to how to handle women in the future.


18. Mary left...
Mon, 11/09/09 9:09 pm

Gentlemen, gentlemen - you are forgetting one thing:

The majority of women may love assholes.... observation proves this to be true... however, you are forgetting exactly the reverse is true.

Men love bitches.

The worse a woman treats a guy, the harder he falls.

However, due to various sociological advantages (i.e. men controlling the media), not as many women have cottoned on to the fact that BITCHES get guys just like ASSHOLES get women.

You may protest.. you may argue... you may not like this fact...

But your claims will be no different to women who protest that women do want nice guys. Women do not want to believe that they will choose someone totally irrationally and neither do men, but you will see it is EQUALLY CORRECT for both genders.

Women just haven't seemed to discover this fact yet to fully exploit it yet as the male controlled media obviously doesn't want them to know this gem of truth.

Biy bitch, I mean a woman who cheats on him, flirts with other guys, stays with him for emotional attention but doesn't truly love him, out for his money, would sacrifice him in a minute for her family/career/something better.

I feel sorry for men in the way that they spend so much of their time pursuing a goal (pussy) that is a primeval function that today has little productivity in today's society except a pat on the back from their buddies and pleasure. In primeval times, it would have resulted in more offspring hence his genes being passed on, yet he still has this same evolutionary goal and spends all his time trying to pursue this when it is of little benefit to his overall life nowadays in the scheme of things.


19. Lola left...
Mon, 11/09/09 9:26 pm

I agree with Mary. Even the shy and quiet guys when they get their nerve don't hit on the shy quiet girls, they want the girl all the other guys are after, the one getting all the free drinks, in the revealing clothing, talking sexy all the time. Men always say they want a nice sweet girl, but it isn't the nice sweet girl that gets there libido racing or catches their interest. It isn't the nice sweet girl that his friends high five him for. It's the beauty/drama queen that they enjoy, despite protests to the contrary. Only when they want someone mom will approve of do they finally turn their attention to the quiet girls, but sometimes they just buck mom's approval and go for the wild girl who turns heads when she's on his arm.


20. Ali left...
Mon, 11/09/09 9:53 pm

There are men as well as women who shoot heroin, does that magically make it any better that both genders do something detrimental? Some people act like they have lemming DNA in their system. Regardless of who wants to ping-pong the issue back and fourth, if your choice in partners keeps putting you in bad company that's not a good thing, and excuses should not be made for that.


21. vintbikescribe left...
Sun, 11/22/09 10:31 pm

A person could get a headache reading all this.

I see some truths in every post here, but the bottom line still seems to fall into what people find acceptable. For me, I refuse to change (temporarily or otherwise) the basic nature of my personality to attract or keep women. In the end, the 'real you' will eventually surface, and then what?

Talk about setting yourself up for failure.

Instead, I've learned to listen better and pay attention. It does not take long to figure out what someone's deal is. For me, the spoiled woman in my life phase is over. I'm dating a nice woman now, but for how long? For sure, I'll be watching carefully instead of jumping in like I did in the past. Better to be alone than wish you were-