relationships

All feelings are welcome

contact me at:
relationships3@aol.com

Latest Commented Entries

Generlaizations

Tuesday, 19 August 2008 6:42 P GMT-05

We Control Men With Our Pussy Power 2661

Wednesday, 13 August 2008 6:53 A GMT-05

commitmentphobia - a real life experience

Saturday, 19 February 2005 3:07 P GMT-05

Nice guy morals. - A note to Nice Guys from a woman 208

Friday, 15 August 2008 6:23 P GMT-05

Law of Attraction 79

Monday, 19 February 2007 9:33 A GMT-05
Category: Attracttion

Overly Emotional

Wednesday, 20 September 2006 6:37 A GMT-05

Why do men no longer pursue women for marriage? 527

Saturday, 16 August 2008 6:24 P GMT-05

Why can’t I get a date or a girlfriend? 903

Saturday, 7 June 2008 6:50 A GMT-05

It's called pussy power 25

Tuesday, 12 August 2008 6:57 A GMT-05

You'll be eaten alive 73

Saturday, 16 August 2008 6:23 A GMT-05

Blog Status

  • 4 yrs 7 wks 1 days old
  • Updated: 20 Aug 2008
  • 7,445 entries
  • 30,580 comments

Quick Poll

Are women really attracted bad boy/jerks more than than they are to caring responsible guys?
Yes
No
Not Sure

relationship talk

Friday, 23 February 2007 12:13 A GMT-05

Newsfeeds

Sunday, 10 September 2006 12:07 P GMT-05

Leo Buscaglia Quotes

Sunday, 27 August 2006 11:32 A GMT-05

About Psychology

Saturday, 8 July 2006 11:48 P GMT-05
Tags:  

Living Love - Practical Spirituality

Saturday, 3 June 2006 4:18 P GMT-05

Fault tolerance

Saturday, 3 June 2006 1:25 P GMT-05
Tags:    

Social Psychology Network

Sunday, 28 May 2006 5:15 P GMT-05

Go Ask Alice

Friday, 14 April 2006 9:09 P GMT-05
Tags:  

Picturing Women

Thursday, 30 March 2006 2:55 P GMT-05
Tags:  

The Attitude Doctor

Wednesday, 29 March 2006 7:01 P GMT-05

From Sophia's Blog verewig

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Call it the eternal embrace.

http://verewig.blog-city.com/

Encyclopedia of Philosophy

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Read My Story

Read My Story.

http://readmystory.blog-city.com/

Midlife Crisis

Midlife Crisis Thoughts

Mailing List

Search Box

 

RelationshipTalk.net
Mars, Venues and in-between

What Women Want

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

How does he make her feel so sexy?

About Bad boys
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Research explores how women choose men 1333

posted Thursday, 24 July 2008

Females chose mates –

"A man can get the best women he can afford."

Females preferences for males who had good financial prospects, were older than themselves, had higher social status,

Women value economic resources substantially more than men do.

Women had higher standards regarding financial prospects at all stages of a relationship

Women desire men, who are high in terms of social status,

Women consistently express a preference for mates who have a high-status profession

Socioeconomic status of the male had a large influence on the female responses at all levels of intimacy

Highest status males were able to offset unattractiveness.

Research shows that male status is more important than attractiveness.

Age is an important factor here as older males are significantly more likely to have achieved a sound economic and financial state than younger, inexperienced males

Increasing age also confers social dominance and higher social status.

Women pay close attention to how men interact with, and are treated by other men.

Example: A jock mistreating a geek causes the woman to go for the jock and be repulsed by the geek.

Height: Height is associated with power and status and studies have shown that height confers economic and social advantages as taller men are more likely to be hired, receive higher salaries, and gain promotion than smaller men.

Socially, people tend to overestimate the height of individuals who are of high status

Taller men are perceived as being more dominant and we would predict that females should choose taller over shorter males

Bachelors are significantly shorter than married men are

Males with facial hair are rated as being more masculine, strong, potent, dominant and courageous,

Male pattern baldness evolved as a signal of aging and social maturity whereby aggression and risk-taking decrease and nurturing behaviors increase.

Baldness was associated with less attractiveness

Males with a high shoulder-to-hip ratio (SHR) reported having sex at an earlier age, had more sexual partners, and more extrapair copulation

Certain sports (boxing, wrestling, fencing, martial arts) also provide accurate information as to how a male would fare in a genuine fight thus are more attractive to women. It’s the importance of sexual display attracts the most women.

Women whose partners have low FA fluctuating asymmetry report more orgasms than those whose partners have high FA fluctuating asymmetry

This is how women objectify men.

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit



The purpose of this site is to allow you to express how you feel. It’s not to determine whom is right or wrong.


1. Dave left...
Tuesday, 6 December 2005 4:22 pm

The Beatles, "Can't buy me love." But apparently they were wrong. Or, were they?

I suspect that the majority of women are as described above but very likely not all.

Can a woman really fall in love with him because of his social status. Is this the way nature has wired women’s instincts?

Why has nature created so many beta and omega males?


2. Ali left...
Tuesday, 6 December 2005 5:33 pm :: http://vvvp.dynu.com/panels/index.html

I think they can sometimes fall in love with what you can do for them, or your potential to provide great things for them and their children in the future. They then tell themselves things like "I can learn to love him". Which is exactly the kind of thing that gets said in arranged marriages. So that's basically what these business deal type marriages are underneath it all...arranged. Love is an afterthought at best and sometimes never really develops at all...no wonder people do the things they do in marriages. It's a recipe for almost guaranteed dysfunction and unhappiness, and people are quick to blame their partner and everybody including the man in the moon but they also need to look at their mindset going into the relationship.


3. Dave left...
Wednesday, 7 December 2005 9:07 am

Women Fall in Love With a Man’s Potential

Do you pride yourself on your ability to "bring out the best in a man"?

Have you ever told yourself that, with a little time and work, "the man you love will become just what you want him to be"?

Have you ever felt that the reason your man hasn’t become as successful as he wants to be is that he hasn’t had anyone to "really love and support him" that is until you came along.

Are you an expert at finding men in need, and focusing much of your time and energy on "helping them, fixing them? Do you avoid your own career, your own dreams by attempting to rescue him. And he didn’t want to change in the first place. He feels bad that you won’t love him just as he is.

You aren’t in love with the man as he actually is—you are in love with his potential.

Having a healthy relationship with a man means loving him for who he is now, and not loving him in spit of who he is today, or in hopes of who he will be tomorrow.

Barbara DeAngelis


4. Charley left...
Sunday, 22 April 2007 1:32 pm

Sex can be purchased. Love cannot be purchased. However, I do think money can at least make the downpayment on love. There's an old saying, "No money, no honey." Not entirely true, but a some truth in it, as sick and sad as that is.


5. Celestia Incognito left...
Sunday, 22 April 2007 1:38 pm

Money is a factor as I said about my ideal man "Is A Good Provider" (so if I am on materity leave I do not have to worry about the finances)...I do expect myself to have a job and contribute though I do not want to be supporting some unemployed bum hasn't the ambition to even pump gas.


6. Charley left...
Monday, 30 April 2007 12:19 am

I think we were referring to a working guy with a low income vs working guy with medium income vs. guy with high income. I don't think anyone was comparing a chronically unemployed guy to those other type guys. With all due respect.


7. Mamasan left...
Monday, 30 April 2007 8:21 am

As some of you are already aware, for the first six years of my life, my dad was my motherer. He was (and still is on the side) a jazz musician, who studied history in university, and would have become a teacher when my brother and I were school aged, had it not been for the pressure from my mom to "get a real job".

Though he performed faboulously in military service, I think he was a better house-husband than he ever was a soldier. I loved having him at home, and my brother would have as well. When we were afraid for a time that our parents would divorce, we decided together that if this happenned, we were going with dad.

Some men were not built to leave their kids behind during their first years. A man can be as manly as you can imagine, and still be the nurturing type who would rather be at home. Then there are the musicians, philosophers, and artists whose work just happens to be at home except at nights and weekends or something, like my dad.

These guys aren't too concerned about making alot of money. That's not where their internal power base is. They're the bass player of your favorite local punk band, and the TA of your chemistry professor or your kid's 4th grade teacher. They're happy if they've made enough in a year to cover their tuition, pay the rent of their studio apartment, their bus pass, and to keep a supply of macaroni and cheese and catsup.

No, they're not financially stable, but most of them I've encountered are very mentally and emotionally stable. Too many of them are basically sexually active monks because many women they meet will shag them because they're interesting and smart, but very few consider them long term material. They get used to this after awhile, and a good many around the age of 26 or so, start proactively rejecting long term relationships. They don't want to go there and get put down.

In my opinion, the male-as-provider thing is far too materially based. Part of providing is being resourceful. If someone can't recognize the resourcefulness of a guy who lives on very little for the sake of pursuing knowledge or for his art, then maybe they're not worth grieving over being rejected by.


8. Tommy left...
Monday, 30 April 2007 10:56 am

Mamasan -

In the mid-1990s, I used to hear this phrase from some women on television: "Romance without finance is a noo-sance!"

(That's the way these particular women pronounced nuisance.)

Anyway, this phrase could be interpreted in one of two ways:

(a) The woman who says it is emphasizing the importance of financial stability in a relationship. After all, the overwhelming majority of break-ups and divorces are the result of financial problems. And of course, marriages were (for millenia) business transactions.

and...

(b) The woman making the comment could be a high-maintenace gold-digger.

Would you provide your thoughts on this comment?


9. Mamasan left...
Monday, 30 April 2007 1:07 pm

Tommy, that saying actually came from way back...the 20's in some blues songs I believe.

Usually, the meaning depends on the woman. In a relationship that could lead to baby making, at least one of the partners has to bring in enough income to support them. This doesn't always have to be the male, but many women would like it to be.


10. Charley left...
Monday, 30 April 2007 7:15 pm

I recently met a woman who flirted during our first meeting. During our second meeting she started by flirting, but soon turned to asking me questions that were in fact an interview. They were similar type questions that a lender would ask me if I were applying for a loan. Seriously. Draw your own conclusions.


11. Ali left...
Monday, 30 April 2007 9:07 pm

Did she have a shovel and a prospector's permit too? lol.

THEMS GOLD IN THEM THAR HILLS!


12. Tommy left...
Tuesday, 1 May 2007 10:07 am

Ali -

LOL


13. Ali left...
Tuesday, 1 May 2007 12:16 pm

Dave - I found an interesting article, not sure if this is the best thread for it but please find an appropriate home for it:

The Price of Condi's loyalty to Bush: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18368744/site/newsweek/

quote: "Bush was also a bad boy. And Rice, according to friends and family, had a thing for bad boys."


14. rod left...
Saturday, 7 June 2008 12:49 pm

the facial hair is defenetly true from my own experience,the longer my beard gets the more women hit on me ,all i have to do now is ride my motorcycle to starbucks and hangout.


15. nafis left...
Sunday, 8 June 2008 11:22 pm

This site is not totally true!!!!! Who ever wrote this needs to pay attention to men and women more. First of all, it doesn't matter how tall a guy is. And women dont always choose tall men over short men. Think about it, we should know that most women want a man thats a least 6'0 and over. A woman may want a tall guy but if he doesnt have certain assets that she's looking for, she will leave. Now if a short guy came her way and he has those assets, most likely she will want him, regardless of his height. And short men can be dominant in social status as well. Also it may be true that tall men make more money than short men but short men could make as much too. They could own their own business or have a high paying job or something. Women who only go for men that are over 6'0 usally have a hard time finding a mate. because #1, she's picky. Thats why its important for a woman to choose a male that likes him for who he is instead of what he has. Second of all, masculinity in males are different. Just because a male has facial hair, doesnt mean he's strong , potent and dominant. There are tons of men that come across as needy and clingy to a woman, which is unattractive. Im saying that males come in many different ways. Clase closed.


16. Ali left...
Monday, 9 June 2008 12:23 am

Naftis - I think they were talking about preferences. I.e. if all other things were equal does height matter? I think if a woman prefers taller men and it comes down to height then obviously that is what she will go for if everything else is roughly similar between the guys. If you're shorter you have to have something the taller guy doesn't have, and it has to be something the woman values or holds in high regard. However if a different taller guy comes along and has that very same thing...then it becomes a situation where HE has something you don't. And women with no sense of loyalty will leave for the next big thing.


17. D J left...
Monday, 9 June 2008 10:56 pm

"This site is not totally true!!!!!"

Signs of intelligent life.